|
Written by Matt
|
|
Tuesday, 14 July 2009 14:59 |
|
In yesterday's edition of "The Good, The Bad, and The Sleezy," our own Sleezy unfairly portrayed the Women of kU as beautiful, sexy young ladies.
It was a slight oversight by Sleezy, but he's excused. We here at Mizzourah like to keep it fair and balanced by telling both sides of the story. He took a glance at the Women of kU Calendar, flipped through a couple pages, and thought the girls looked attractive enough to post on this site.
Like I said, the column was one-sided; the thing Sleezy failed to mention are the disturbing images in the back of the calendar, mainly the fact that some of these ladies look like dudes.
Take November for instance:
 Fun fact: she's had 34 tackles at middle linebacker for the jayhawks this season. And one forced fumble (the food I just ate). August, September, and October didn't go so well either:



Those are some handsome women to say the least. Luckily kU is full of manly-looking women and k.u.chebags who aren't very picky - it's really a match made in heaven.
I don't think it's a surprise they stuck these four in the back (the preferred way to stick any of these girls), but hey, let's give kU credit for enrolling enough women to produce 2/3 of a solid calendar.
And in Lawrence, 66% is overachieving.
Trackback(0)
|